Autocracy   promotion:   : theoretical  framework and comparative analysis.  The cases of Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, China,   Saudi   Arabia,   Egypt,  Turkey  and Iran.

Fabio  Fossati

doi:10.35305/rr.vi5.75

Authors

Fabio Fossati University of Trieste

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.vi5.75

Keywords:

Autocracy promotion, Hybrid regimes, Hard power, Soft power, Foreign policy

Abstract

The models of autocracy promotion are four: a) Military intervention, through a war. b) Economic blackmail: by applying negative sanctions to pro-West democratizing regimes: trade or investments’ sanctions, and cuts to economic or military aid. c) Rewards: by positive sanctions to authoritarian or hybrid regimes, through diplomatic pressure, military and economic assistance. d) Spontaneous emulation: an authoritarian state is a cultural, economic, political and military model for other non-democratic regimes, that autonomously follow the leader. A rigid autocracy promotion is based on the support of only authoritarian regimes, while in a flexible relation there is the possibility of a ‘B plan’, by promoting hybrid regimes too. Hard power relations are anchored to direct military interventions, while soft power is based on emulation, diplomatic, economic, indirect military inducements and blackmails. The cases under review in this issue are: China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Cuba and Venezuela.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Fabio Fossati, University of Trieste

References

Bader, M. (2014). Democracy promotion and authoritarian diffusion: the foreign origins of post-Soviet election laws. Europe-Asia Studies, (66), 1350-70.

Bader, J., Gravingholt, J. & Kastner, A. (2010). Would autocracies promote autocracy? A political economy perspective on regime type export in regional neighbourhoods. Comparative Politics, 16(1), 81-100.

Bank, A. (2017). The study of authoritarian diffusion and cooperation: comparative lessons on interests vs ideology, nowadays and in history. Democratization, 24(7), 1345-57.

Brownlee, J. (2017). The limited reach of authoritarian powers. Democratization, 24(7), 1326-44.

Burnell, P. (2010a). Is there a new autocracy promotion? FRIDE Working Papers, (26). Madrid: Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Dialogo Exterior.

Burnell, P. (2010b). Promoting democracy and promoting autocracy. Towards a comparative evaluation. Journal of Politics and Law, 3(2), 1-14.

Burnell, P. & Schlumberger, O. (2018). International politics and national political regimes. Promoting democracy – Promoting autocracy. New York: Routledge.

Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21.

Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F., & Walker, C. (2016). Authoritarianism goes global. The challenge to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Erdmann, G., Bank, A., Hoffmann, B., & Richter, T. (2013). International cooperation of authoritarian regimes. Toward a conceptual framework. GIGA Working Papers, (229). Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

Fossati, F. (1999). Cooperazione allo sviluppo: la condizionalità politica. Politica Internazionale, 27(3), 11-21.

Fossati, F. (2004). L’intervento esterno: attori, strumenti e modalità. In L. Mattina (Ed.), La Sfida dell’Allargamento. L’Unione Europea e la democratizzazione dell’Europa centro-orientale (pp. 37-83). Bologna: Il Mulino.

Fossati, F. (2011). L’Unione Europea come ancora nei processi di democratizzazione dei paesi dell’est Europa dopo il 2007. Quaderni di Scienza Politica, 18(2), 255-91.

Fossati, F. (2013). Il rapporto fra i processi di democratizzazione e liberalizzazione economica nei paesi non occidentali dopo l’89. Quaderni di Scienza Politica, 20(3), 369-403.

Fossati, F. (2017). Interests and stability or ideologies and order in contemporary world politics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Fossati, F. (2018). Modelli di regimi non democratici. Quaderni di Scienza politica, 25(1), 7-31.

Goldsmith, B. E. (2014). The east Asian peace as second order diffusion effect. International Studies Review, 16(2), 275-89.

Huntington, S. (1993). The third wave. Democratization in late 20th century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Kneuer, M. & Demmelhuber, T. (2016). Gravity centers of authoritarian rule. A conceptual approach. Democratization, 23(5), 775-96.

Kneuer, M. & Demmelhuber, T. (2021). Authoritarian gravity centers: A cross-regional study of authoritarian promotion and diffusion. New York: Routledge.

Levitsky, S. & Way, L.A. (2006). Linkage versus leverage. Rethinking the international dimension of regime change. Comparative Politics, 38(4), 379-400.

Levitsky, S. & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Morlino, L. (2008). Regimi ibridi o regimi in transizione. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 38(2), 169-90.

Risse, T. & Babayan, N. (2015). Democracy promotion and the challenge of illiberal regional powers. Introduction to the special issue. Democratization, 22(3), 381-99.

Tansey, O. (2016a). The international politics of authoritarian rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tansey, O. (2016b). The problem with autocracy promotion. Democratization, 23(1), 141-63.

Van Der Bosch, J. (2020). Introducing regime cluster theory. Framing regional diffusion dynamics of democratization and autocracy promotion. International Journal of Political Theory, 4(1), 74-106.

Vanderhill, R. (2013). Promoting authoritarianism abroad. London: Lynne Rienner.

Way, L. (2016). The authoritarian threat: weaknesses of autocracy promotion. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 64-75.

Yakouchyk, K. (2018). Beyond autocracy promotion: a review. Political Studies Review, 17(2), 147-60.