Autocracy promotion in Russia’s foreign policy: : a comparison between Armenia and Belarus

Francesco  Gabrielli

doi:10.35305/rr.vi5.77

Autores/as

Francesco Gabrielli Universitá di Firenze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.vi5.77

Palabras clave:

Autocracy promotion, Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Eurasia

Resumen

Russia’s influence in its Near Abroad (called “Bližkoe zarubeže” in Russian) has created a permissive zone, in which the countries within that area can ignore their democratic commitments being aware that their loyalty to Russia can protect them against any possible interference of the US and the EU. The analysis of bilateral relations between Armenia and Russia on one side, and between Russia and Belarus on the other, has led to the identification of the four models of autocracy promotion: spontaneous emulation, hard power efforts (mainly concerning military intervention), rewards (primarily regarding economic assistance) and negative sanctions (or blackmailing). A combination of rewards and punishments has proved to be the most frequent tactic used by the Kremlin, which has also been facilitated by Armenia and Belarus’s weak linkage and leverage with Western democracy promoters. Russia’s “conservative” diplomacy, which has followed a realist approach, has not resulted in a rigorous autocratic promotion policy, but the Belarusian and Armenian cases demonstrate that in these two (non-democratic) regimes (and also in those of Central Asia) the presence of Russia is stronger than in the democratic ones, such as the Baltic States. Russia’s “sanctions” against Belarus have been less than those directed against Armenia, owing mainly to the former country’s proximity to Russia in the cultural arena and the strategic geopolitical location of Belarus in Eastern Europe. Armenia, on the other hand, has also been subject to direct military intervention by Russia, which was however limited to the first Artsakh war

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Francesco Gabrielli, Universitá di Firenze

Citas

Ambrosio, T. (2006). The Political Success of Russia-Belarus Relations: Insulating Minsk from a Color Revolution. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 14(3), 407-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.14.3.407-434

Aslund, A. (2002). Is the Belarusian economic model viable? In A. Lewis (ed.), The EU and Belarus: Between Moscow and Brussels (pages). London: Federal Trust.

Astapenia, R., and Balkunets, D. (2016). Belarus-Russia Relations After the Ukraine Conflict. Minsk/London: Ostrokorski Centre. Retrieved from: http://belarusdigest.skaryna.org.uk/papers/belarus-russia-relations.pdf.

Babayan, N. (2015). The Return of the Empire? Russia's Counteraction to Transatlantic Democracy Promotion in Its Near Abroad. Democratization, 22(3), 438-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.993973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.993973

Bader, M. (2014). Democracy Promotion and Authoritarian Diffusion: The Foreign Origins of Post-Soviet Election Laws. Europe-Asia Studies, 66, 1350–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.939521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.939521

Balakishi, S. (2016). Eurasian Economic Union: Russia’s New Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus. Maastricht School of Management Working Paper 2016/1. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/msm/wpaper/2016-1.html.

Balmaceda, M. M. (2014). Living the high life in Belarus. Budapest: CEU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155225475

Barros, G. (2020, October). Belarus Warning Update: Putin Intensifies Russian-Belarusian Military Integration. Critical Threats. Retrieved from: https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/belarus-warning-update-putin-intensifies-russian-belarusian-military-integration.

Batashvili, D. (2019). Nikol Pashinyan’S Russian Problem. GFSIS. Retrieved from: https://www.gfsis.org/publications/view/2684.

Burant, S. R. (1995). Foreign Policy and National Identity: A Comparison of Ukraine and Belarus. Europe-Asia Studies, 47(7), 1125-1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139508412312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139508412312

Burnell, P. (2010). Promoting Democracy and Promoting Autocracy: Towards A Comparative Evaluation. Journal of Politics and Law, 3(2), 1-12. https://doi:10.5539/jpl.v3n2p3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v3n2p3

Czerny, M. (2020, August). Russia’S Policy Towards Belarus During Alyaksandr Lukashenka’S Fifth Presidential Term | Foundation for Strategic Research. Fondation Pour La Recherche Stratégique. Retrieved from: https://www.frstrategie.org/en/publications/notes/russia-policy-towards-belarus-during-alyaksandr-lukashenka-s-fifth-presidential-term-2020.

Danielyan, E. (2003, May). Russia Tightens Grip on Armenia With Debt Agreements. Eurasianet. Retrieved from: https://eurasianet.org/russia-tightens-grip-on-armenia-with-debt-agreements.

Danielyan, E. (2003). Russian Parliament Ratifies Debt Deal With Armenia. 2003. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved from: https://www.azatutyun.am/a/1571472.html.

Davidian, G. (2019). Armenian “Velvet Revolution”: Why has Russia’s Reaction Been Tame? In F. Labarre and G. Niculescu (Eds.), South Caucasus: Leveraging Political Change in A Context of Strategic Volatility (pages). Vienna: Republic of Austria/Federal Ministry of Defense.

Derluguian, G., and Hovhannisyan, R. (2018). The Armenian Anomaly: Toward an Interdisciplinary Interpretation. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 26(4), 441-464.

Freedom House. (2022). Expanding Freedom and Democracy. Freedom House. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2022/global-expansion-authoritarian-rule.

Fossati, F., and Galtung, J. (2008). I Conflitti Armati Contemporanei. Gorizia: IUISE.

Fossati, F. (2018). Introduzione alla politica mondiale. Milano: Angeli.

Giragosyan, R. (2014). Armenia’s strategic u-turn. ECFR Memo Policy, (99), 1–6. Retrieved from: https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/ECFR99_ARMENIA_MEMO_AW.pdf.

Hale, H. E. (2018). How Crimea Pays: Media, Rallying 'Round The Flag, And Authoritarian Support. Comparative Politics, 50(3), 369-391. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041518822704953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5129/001041518822704953

Heinrich, A. (2017). Energy Issues in Russia’S Relations with Belarus. Russian Analytical Digest, (206). Retrieved from: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD206%20(002).pdf#page=14.

Henderson, S. (2010). Shaping Civic Advocacy: International and Domestic Policies toward Russia’s NGO Sector. Advocacy Organizations and Collective Action. In A. Prakash and M. Gugerty (Eds.), Advocacy organizations and collective action (pages). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762635.014

Ieraci, G., and Paulon, A. (2010). Measures of Freedom, Democracy and the ‘Freedom in the World Index’. Quaderni di Scienza Politica, XVII(2), 389-413.

Ioffe, G. (2004). Understanding Belarus: Economy and Political Landscape. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(1), 85-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813032000161455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813032000161455

Jonavicius, L. (2013). From Russia with Love: Internal Balance of Power in Russia and the Survival of Lukashenko's Regime. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 29(29), 81-111.

Kłysiński, K., and Żochowski, P. (2016). The End of the Myth of a Brotherly Belarus? Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies.

Kudors, A. (2017). Belarusian Foreign Policy. Riga: University of Latvia Press.

Leshchenko, N. (2008). The National Ideology and the Basis of the Lukashenka Regime in Belarus. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), 1419-1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292234

Libman, A. (2016). Supranational organizations: Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union. In A. Obydenkova and A. Libman (Eds.), Autocratic and Democratic External Influences in Post-Soviet Eurasia (133-158). New York: Routledge.

Marin, A. (2020). The Union State of Belarus and Russia. Myths and Realities of Political-Military Integration. Vilnius: Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis. Retrieved from: https://vilniusinstitute.lt/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Anais-Marin-Union-State-of-Belarus-and-Russia.pdf.

Minassian, G. (2008). Armenia, a Russian outpost in the Caucasus? Russie. Nei. Visions, 27, 1-19.

Natalizia, G. (2019). Black Knight as A Strategic Choice? Causes and Modes of Russia’S Support to The Authoritarianism in Southern Caucasus. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 49(2), 175-

https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.5

Nechyparenka, Y. (2011). Democratic Transition in Belarus: Cause(s) of Failure. Institut Barcelona Estudis Internacionals, Student Paper Series, (3). Retrieved from: https://www.ibei.org/ibei_studentpaper03_71875.pdf.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power and American Foreign Policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345

Pinchuk, D., and Osborn, A. (2018, May). New Armenian PM tells Putin he wants closer ties with Russia. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-armenia-putin-pashinyan/new-armenian-pm- tellsputin-he-wants-closer-ties-with-russia-idUSKCN1IF1A3.

Roberts, S., and Ulrike Z. (2018). Explaining the Pattern of Russian Authoritarian Diffusion in Armenia. East European Politics, 34(2), 152-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1457525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1457525

Sivitsky, A. (2019). Belarus-Russia: from a strategic deal to an integration ultimatum. Russia Foreign Policy Papers, 16(XII). Retrieved from: https://www.fpri.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/rfp3-sivitsky.pdf.

Sprague, A. (2016). Russian Meddling in Its Near Abroad. The Use of Frozen Conflicts as A Foreign Policy Tool. Institut Barcelona Estudis Internacionals, Student Paper Series, (28). Retrieved from: https://www.ibei.org/ibei_studentpaper28_71440.pdf.

Suzdaltsev, A. (2020). Crisis of The Union State of Russia and Belarus. Social Sciences, 51(002), 68-83. https://doi:10.21557/ssc.60231517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21557/SSC.60231517

Syssoyeva, R. (2019). Understanding The Enlargement of the Eurasian Economic Union: The Case of Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. Politikon: IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 40, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.40.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.40.3

Terzyan, A. (2017). The EU Vs. Russia in The Foreign Policy Discourse of Armenia: The Fragility of Normative Power or The Power of Russian Coercion? Eastern Journal of European Studies, 8(2), 185-203.

Terzyan, A. (2018). The Anatomy of Russia’s Grip on Armenia: Bound to Persist? CES Working Papers, 10(2).

The Government of the Republic of Armenia. (2020). National Security Strategy of the Republic of Armenia. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.am/en/National-Security-Strategy/.

Tolstrup, J. (2015). Black Knights and Elections in Authoritarian Regimes: Why and How Russia Supports Authoritarian Incumbents in Post-Soviet States. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12079

Trenin, D. (2005). Russia, The EU and The Common Neighbourhood. Centre for European Reform Essays. Retrieved from: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/essay_russia_trenin_sept05-2151.pdf.

Vielmini, F. (2013, October). Armenia's Shift towards the Eurasian Economic Union: A Rejoinder of Realpolitik. ISPI. Retrieved from: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/armenias-shift-towards-eurasian-economic-union-rejoinder-realpolitik-9283.

Way, L. A. (2015). The Limits of Autocracy Promotion: The Case of Russia in The ‘Near Abroad’. European Journal of Political Research, 54(4), 691-706. https://doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12092

Yavuz, M. H., and Huseynov, V. (2020). The Second Karabakh War: Russia Vs. Turkey? Middle East Policy, 27(4), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12529