Las raíces subjetivas y sociales de la pérdida de legitimidad de los regímenes democráticos y del surgimiento de los movimientos sociales actuales

Authors

  • Ilan Bizberg Colegio de México. México.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.v1i1.41

Keywords:

social movements, crisis of representative democracy, participative democracy, subjectivity, time

Abstract

This article argues that the movements that initiate with the Arab Spring, continue with the Indignado movement in Madrid and Occupy Wall Street, and continue with the gilets jaunes in France and with the multiple current social movements: Hong Kong, Chile, Lebanon, Colombia, Mexico, have common sources. Two distinct ones have been pointed out: the great inequality that has emerged in almost all the countries due to financialization and the crisis of legitimacy of the majority of the representative democracies in the world. The first may explain several of the movements in some countries, although it does not reveal everything. The second one, which refers to the crisis of legitimacy of most current governments, is not a crisis of democracy that leads, inevitably, to populism, but a crisis of representative democracy. This article will discuss, in its first section, this crisis of representative democracy and the manner in which the new contemporary social movements demand, and to a certain degree, experience participative democracy. In the second section, I will analyze the subjective sources of the present social malaise that lies at the heart of the present social movements that directly address subjective and cultural issues. Finally, in the third section, I will analyze how several of these subjective claims concern a clash of temporalities: between subjective temporality and social and institutional time as well as, for the first time in the history of mankind, with geological time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Berger, P. L. y Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Nueva York: Anchor Books - Doubleday and Co.

Bergson, H. (1960). Time and Free Will. Nueva York - Evanston: Harper and Row Publishers.

Boyer, R. (2013). “Les crises financières comme conflit de temporalites”, Vingtième siècle. Revue d’Histoire, Nº 117.

Coppedge, M. (2002). “Venezuela: popular sovereignty versus liberal democracy”, Working Paper, Nº 294, Universidad de Notre Dame.

Elias, N. (1996). Du Temps. París: Fayard.

Farro, A. L. (2014). “A New Era for Collective Movements: The Subjectivization of Collective Action”, en Farro, A. L. y Lustiger-Thaler, H. (ed.) Reimagining Social Movements. From Collectives to Individuals. Surrey: Ashgate.

Graeber, D. (2012). “Faire l’impossible. À propos de la décision au consensus”, Contretemps (ed.) D’Athènes à Wall Street, #indignés! Échos d’une insurrection des consciences. París: La Découverte.

Gohn, M. da G. (2014). “Brazilian social movements in the Latin American context”, en Farro, A. L. y Lustiger-Thaler, H. (ed.) Reimagining Social Movements. From Collectives to Individuals. Surrey: Ashgate.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Nueva York - Evanston: Harper and Row Publishers.

Hermet, G. (2001). Les populismes dans le monde. Une histoire sociologique XIX-XXème siècle. París: Fayard.

Horkheimer, M. y Adorno, T. W. (1974). La dialectique de la Raison. París: Gallimard.

Jeanpierre, L. (2019). In Girum. Les lecons politiques des rond-points. París: La découverte.

Laclau, E. (2005). La razón Populista. México: FCE.

Le Bot, Y. (2013). “De la révolution à la mondialisation. Changement de paradigme en Amérique latine”, Socio, Nº 2, Révolutions, contestations, indignations. París: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

Martuccelli, D. (2001). Dominations ordinaires. París: Balland.

Naveau, P. (2019). La construction de paix par “le bas” dans des contextes de violence structurelle. L’expérience collective et les pratiques artistiques comme piliers de la reconstruction de la société mexicaine.Tésis de Doctorado, Universidad Libre de Lovaina.

Noriel, G. (2019). Les gilets jaunes à la lumière de l’histoire. París: Le Monde/l’aube.

Pleyers, G. (2010). Alter-globalization. Becoming an Actor in the Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

- - - - - - (2018). Movimientos sociales en el siglo XXI.Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

Rosa, H. (2014). Aliénation et accéleration. Vers une théorie critique de la modernité tardive. París: La Découverte.

Rousseau, J. J. (1964). Du Contrat Social. París: Gallimard - Folio essais.

Schütz, A. (1998). Ëléments de Sociologie Phénoménologique. París: L’Harmattan.

Sen, A. (2003). L’économie est une science morale. París: La découverte.

Targuieff, P.A. (2007). L’Illusion populiste. París: Champs Flammarion.

Touraine, A. (2013). La Fin des Sociétés. París: Éditions du Seuil.

Touraine, A. y Khosrokhavar, F. (2000). La recherche du soi. París: Fayard.

Wieviorka, M. (2003). “Un autre monde est posible”, en Un autre monde…contestations, dérives et suprises dan l’antimondialisation. París: Balland.

Mosca, L. (2010). “From the streets to the net? the Political use of the internet by social movements”, International Journal of E-Politics, Nº 1, pp. 1-21.

Varios autores (2013). Cidades Rebeldes. Passe livre e as manifestacoes que tomarama as ruas do Brasil. Sao Paulo: Boitempo.

Published

2020-06-01

How to Cite

Bizberg, I. . (2020). Las raíces subjetivas y sociales de la pérdida de legitimidad de los regímenes democráticos y del surgimiento de los movimientos sociales actuales. Revista Euro Latinoamericana De Análisis Social Y Político (RELASP), 1(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.v1i1.41

Issue

Section

Dossier