Envejecimiento y miopía social en los Estados Unidos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.v1i2.26Keywords:
United States, Social Myopia, NeoliberalismAbstract
The United States confronts reconfigurations complicated by generational unbalances among its ethnic and racial groups. These unbalances, concerning population numbers and wealth distribution, foster a staunch individualism undermining the stability of collective support networks, such as that country’s social security system. This paper highlights an everyday expression of such individualism to point at a social myopia in which, in an apparently inconsequential manner, short-term, individualistic interests erode the common good. It calls attention to the fact that a reluctance to share privileges and influence in accordance to the new social and racial percentages of the country challenges its widely claimed democratic principle of majority rule.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Administration on Aging. (2018). 2018 Profile of Older Americans. (April). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Recuperado de https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/Aging%20and%20Disability%20in%20America/2018OlderAmericansProfile.pdf.
Baker, D. y Rosnick, D. (2009). The Wealth of the Baby Boom Cohorts after the Collapse of the Housing Bubble. CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2009-07, Center for Economic and Policy Research. Recuperado de http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/baby-boomer-wealth-2009-02.pdf.
Estes, C. L. (2011). “Crises and Old Age Policy”. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media.
Fontenot, K., Semega, J. y Kollar, M. (2018). Income and Poverty in the United States 2017. U.S. Census Bureau. Recuperado de https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p60263.html#:~:text=Median%20household%20income%20was%20%2461%2C372,percent%20from%202016%20to%20%2477%2C713.
Kochhar, R. y Cilluffo, A. (2017). How wealth inequality has changed in the U.S. since the Great Recession, by race, ethnicity and income. Estados Unidos, Pew Research Center. Recuperado de https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/01/how-wealth-inequality-has-changed-in-the-u-s-since-the-great-recession-by-race-ethnicity-and-income/.
Marshall, V. W. y Bengtson, V. L. (2011). “Theoretical Perspectives on the Sociology of Aging”. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media.
Peters, T. y Barletta, M. (2005). Trends: Recognize Analyze Capitalize. Estados Unidos, Dorling Kindersley. Recuperado de https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/.
Pfeffer, F. T. y Schoeni, R. F. (2016). “How Wealth Inequality Shapes Our Future”. Journal of the Social Sciences, Vol. 2, N°6, pp. 2-22. The Russell Sage Foundation.
Poston Jr., D. L. (2020). 3 ways that the U.S. population will change over the next decade. PBS News Hour. Recuperado de https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/3-ways-that-the-u-s-population-will-change-over-the-next-decade.
Quadagno, J., Lennox Kail, B. y Shekha, K. R. (2011). “Welfare States: Protecting or Risking Old Age. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media.
Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees. (2020). A Summary of the 2020 Annual Reports: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/
Social Security Fact Sheet (2020). Recuperad de https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/basicfact- alt.pdf.
Vandenbroucke, G. y Zhu, H. (2017). “Aging and Wealth Inequality”. Economic Synopses #2. Estados Unidos, Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis.
Wassel, J. I. (2011). “Business and Aging: The Boomer Effect on Consumers and Marketing”. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media. Recuperado de https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-1-4419-7374-0.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
