Relaciones difíciles en la red de apoyo social Estudio descriptivo por grupo de edad y género
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35305/rr.v1i2.21Keywords:
Difficult relationships, Social support network, Life course, GenderAbstract
This study explores the type of bond in the social support network with which the rela-tionship is more difficult according to age group and gender, and the type of experien-ces associated with that relationship. A descriptive study of transversal non-experimen-tal design was carried out, using mixed methods. We interviewed 100 people between 20 and 90 years old, from the city of Mar del Plata. The Structured Interview of Social Support Sources and a semi-directed interview were administered. The results showed that the difficult bonds are also the closest, evidence an ambivalent nature and they respond to normative changes typical of each life stage. It is expected that these results provide useful information for theoretical and applied issues.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Amadasi, E. y Tinoboras, C. (2016). El desafío de la diversidad en el envejecimiento. Familia, sociabilidad y bienestar en un nuevo contexto. Argentina, Educa.
Arias, C. J. (2014). “Vínculos de apoyo y emociones en la vejez”. En R. Iacub (ed.) Larna Argentina 2014. Seminario Diversidad Cultural y envejecimiento: la familia y la comunidad. Argentina.
- - - - - - (2015). “La red de apoyo social. Cambios a lo largo del ciclo vital”. Revista Kairós Gerontología, Nº 18, pp. 149-172.
Arias, C. J. y Iacub, R. (2013). “¿Por qué investigar aspectos positivos en la vejez?. Contri-buciones para un cambio de paradigma”. Publicatio UEPG: Ciências Humanas, Linguistica, Letras e Artes, Nº 21, pp. 271-281.
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U. y Staudinger, U. M. (1999). “Lifespan theory in develop-mental psychology”. En Damon, W. (ed. de serie) y Lerner, R. M. (ed. de volumen) Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development. Estados Unidos: Wiley.
Carstensen, L. L. (1992). “Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socio-emotional selectivity theory”. Psychology and aging, Nº 7, pp. 331-338.
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H. y Charles, S. T. (2003). “Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life”. Motivation and emotion, Nº 27, pp. 103-123.
Carver, C. S. (1997). “Adult attachment and personality: Converging evidence and a new measure”. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, Nº 23, pp. 865-883.
Charles, S. T. y Piazza, J. R. (2007). “Memories of social interactions: age differences in emotional intensity”. Psychology and aging, Nº 22, pp. 300-309.
Connidis, I. A. y McMullin, J. A. (2002). “Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A criti cal perspective”. Journal of marriage and family, Nº 64, pp. 558-567.
Cornwell, B. y Laumann, E. O. (2013). “The health benefits of network growth: New evi-dence from a national survey of older adults”. Social Science y Medicine, Nº 125, pp. 1-13.
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutman, M.L. y Handson, W.E. (2003). “Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs”. En Tashakkori, A. y Teddlie, C. (ed.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Estados Unidos, Sage.
Cumming, E., y Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing Old. Estados Unidos, Basic Books.
Dittmann-Kohli, F. (2005). “La mediana edad y la identidad desde una perspectiva cultu-ral y en el curso de la vida”. En Willis, S. y Martin, M. (ed.) Middle Adulthood. A Lifespan perspective. Estados Unidos, Sage.
English, T. y Carstensen, L. (2014). “Selective Narrowing of Social Networks Across Adulthood is Associated With Improved Emotional Experience in Daily Life”. International Journal of Behavioral Development, pp. 195-202.
Fingerman, K. L., Chen, P. C., Hay, E., Cichy, K. E. y Lefkowitz, E. S. (2006). “Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship”. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Nº 61, pp. 152-160.
Fingerman, K. L., Hay, E. L. y Birditt, K. S. (2004). “The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships”. Journal of Marriage and Family, Nº 66, pp. 792-808.
Fredrickson, B. L. y Carstensen, L. L. (1990). “Choosing social partners: how old age and anticipated endings make people more selective”. Psychology and aging, Nº 5, pp. 335-347.
Glaser, B. y Straus, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Estados Unidos, Aldine Publishing Company.
Iacub, R. (2006). Erótica y Vejez. Argentina, Paidós.
- - - - - - (2011). Identidad y envejecimiento. Argentina, Paidós.
- - - - - - (2015). Todo lo que usted siempre quiso saber sobre su jubilación y nunca se animó a preguntar. Argentina, Paidós.
Iacub, R. y Sabatini, B. (2012). Psicología de la mediana edad y la vejez, Vol. 3, Especialización en Gerontología Comunitaria e Institucional. Argentina: Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
Lüscher, K. y Pillemer, K. (1998). “Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life”. Journal of Marriage and the Family, Nº 60, pp. 413-425.
Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A., Beckett, L. A., Seeman, T. E., Evans, D. A. y Berkman, L. F. (1999). “Social networks and disability transitions across eight intervals of yearly data in the New Haven EPESE”. Journal of Gerontology, Behavior Psychology and Social Sciences, Nº 54, pp. 162-172.
Rook, K. S. (2003). “Exposure and reactivity to negative social exchanges: a preliminar in-ves tigation using daily diary data”. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, Nº 58B, pp. 100-111.
Ryff, C. D. y Singer, B. (2007). “Ironías de la condición humana: bienestar y salud en el camino a la mortalidad”. En Aspinwall, L. G. y Staudinger, U. M. (ed.) Psicología del potencial humano: cuestiones fundamentales y normas para una Psicología Positiva. España: Gedisa.
Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E.L., Hight, T. L. y Berry, J. W. (2000). “Seeking forgiveness: theoretical context and an initial empirical study”. Journal of Psychology and Theology, Nº 28, pp. 21-35.
Scolni, M. y Goris Walker, G. (2012). “Un estudio cualitativo sobre la autonomía y los vín-culos en relación al bienestar psicológico en adultos mayores y jóvenes”. IV Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología XIX Jornadas de Investigación VIII Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. Argentina, Facultad de Psicología-Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Siedlecki, K. L., Salthouse, T. A., Oishi, S. y Jeswani, S. (2014). “The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across age”. Social indicators research, Nº 117, pp. 561-576.
Sluzki, C. E. (1996). La red social: frontera de la práctica sistémica. España, Gedisa.
Stephens, C., Alpass, F., Towers, A. y Stevenson, B. (2011). “The Effects of Types of Social Networks, Perceived Social Support, and Loneliness on the Health of Older People”. Accounting for the Social Context Journal of Aging and Health, Nº 23, pp. 887-911.
Troll, L. y Fingerman, K. L. (1999). “Emotional experiences in later life”. En Levinson, D., Ponzetti, J. y Jorgensen, P. (ed.) Encyclopedia of human emotions. Estados Unidos, Macmillan.
Vaux, A. y Harrison, D. (1985). “Support network characteristics associated with support satisfaction and perceived support”. American Journal of Community Psychology, Nº 13, pp. 245-265.
Waldinger, R. J., Cohen, S., Schulz, M. S. y Crowell, J. A. (2015). “Security of attachment to spouses in late life: Concurrent and prospective links with cognitive and emotional well-being”. Clinical Psychological Science, Nº 3, pp. 516-529.
Zamarrón-Cassinello, M. D. (2006). El bienestar subjetivo en la vejez. España, Portal Mayores.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
